Ohio Physical Therapy Jurisprudence Test 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

A physical therapist can appropriately terminate services when a patient is not making progress or refuses to participate in the plan of care. This scenario is critical because the effectiveness of physical therapy largely depends on the patient's active participation and adherence to the treatment protocol. When a patient fails to engage in their therapy, it becomes difficult for the therapist to achieve the desired outcomes, which can lead to stagnation in the rehabilitation process.

In cases where a patient is non-compliant, the therapist must consider not only the therapeutic goals but also the need for collaboration between the therapist and the patient. If the patient is not participating as outlined in the plan of care, this raises concerns about the appropriateness and effectiveness of continued treatment. Consequently, when progress is not being made due to non-compliance or refusal to adhere to the therapeutic process, it is justified for the therapist to evaluate and potentially terminate services to allow the patient the opportunity to seek alternative solutions or more suitable interventions.

Additionally, when patients have met their goals, it does not necessarily indicate the need for termination if there are further areas of improvement or additional goals to address. Likewise, a physical therapist’s workload is not a valid reason for service termination; professional responsibilities require prioritization of patient care above personal convenience.